1,863 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 29, 2019 20:47:24 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Aug 29, 2019 20:47:24 GMT
Overlooked the agreement on mainstream media, both sides adamantly believe it is in the hands of the other and their views were not being represented.
Not sure whether this validates independence or evidence of confirmatory bias in the way we select our news stories.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 29, 2019 21:27:36 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Aug 29, 2019 21:27:36 GMT
Well, where does the mainstream media recruit from ..
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 7:31:09 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 7:31:09 GMT
Re-read what I wrote please. I don't think I criticised the validity of BBC reporting. In fact, what I said, when responding to your BBC quote (with another BBC quote - for a degree of impartiality) was that the BBC "regurgitate" the "manipulation of the people" e.g. whatever lies or arguments politicians or others have to spread. In the same way that we just reposted a quote from a source, BBC News do just that too. It's the source of the words that provides the augmentation of the masses and the BBC just broadcast it. I don't think it's necessary to try create a power struggle with a 'who works where' brag, but if you want me to PM you my ID so you can find me on PeopleView let me know Well if you think saying that the BBC ‘regurgitates the manipulation of the people’ isn’t an attack on the validity of BBC reporting, we’ll have to agree to differ! But thanks for trying to mansplain to an ex-journalist how news works. Not sure about the value of your PeopleView comment? Plenty of people on here have previously mentioned where they work(ed) and not been attacked for it. Why now with someone who disagrees with you? I mentioned I worked at the Beeb to show I was familiar with their stance on neutrality and equally familiar with people across the political spectrum (and more widely) attacking the validity of their reporting. Which I feel shows they’re pretty neutral most of the time. I should have thought it was quite clear it wasn’t a boast! In the same way you felt my response was an attempt at mansplaining*, I perceived your comment "As someone who used to work for the BBC" as an attempt to patronise me. In the interests of maintaining a neutral ground I referenced PeopleView because its BBC Gateway tool that only Staff have access to, take from that what you will. *which I disagree with - I'd have replied the same way to anyone on this board, irregardless of gender.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 7:34:53 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 7:34:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 9:03:50 GMT
Which - to go wider - brings me back to a point I’ve made repeatedly here: clarity. I believe Johnson is trying to provide that. Clarity on what, exactly? Unless I've missed it, he hasn't said anything about what his alternative proposals to the EU are/are going to be. It's for us to make those proposals - the EU owe us nothing, they have no obligation whatsoever to compromise and anyone who thinks they will buckle is frankly deluding themselves. So, if Boris hasn't told us what we are going to propose, then it seems to me that we have even less clarity than under the previous Prime Minister...
|
|
1,863 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Aug 30, 2019 10:08:10 GMT
I believe there is clarity, Johnson is basically stating we are going through wit a No Deal Brexit on the 31st Oct, playing brinkmanship with the EU to see if they will cave in and provide a deal that meets his requirements i.e all the benefits the EU excluding the ones we don’t like.
The risk is that if this gambit and the suspension of Parliament a constitutional precedence is to back up his stance the EU do not play ball.
The train has left the Station and we are leaving on the 31st Oct and if with a No-Deal the accepted worst case scenario so be it.
As previously stated to comply with the Democratic process leaving the EU is a given. (We have voted as a nation in 2 elections where the mandate was within the Conservative manifesto and the referendum to leave the EU, we have had a second referendum by proxy in May’s election, we as a nation agreed by our Parliamentary Democracy to vote for May’s Tory manifesto. Talking to Remainers yesterday if May had not called the election and muddied the water by not having a clear majority we would have left the EU by now, the confusion now, is the mandate for Brexit as in the Tory manifesto valid as the Tory are a minority Government and require DUP support to Govern)
I voted remain and believe it is a monumental error to leave without a deal and to leave full stop, a decision that will haunt us for years to come, we have had the referendum a post referendum election where it was clearly stated we are leaving the EU if the Tories take power and cannot democratically rescind what has been voted for without another General Election which is not required for another few years as per or Parliamentay rules and any General Election will now realistically be after the leaving date so cannot influence the decision of our previous voting intentions.
The closure of Parliament to push through this is where my allegiance to the Democratic process is undermined, we cannot say we have followed the Representative Democratic process which we have up to now and then close the Government as leaving us to debate in Parliament will undermine the russian roulette Johnson is playing.
One thing I hope is that people will take voting more seriously, understand what we are agreeing to in the printed manifestos, (the fact that most Parties rescind on their manifesto is neither here nor there) sadly it is likely to have the opposite effect. Honestly I have never read a manifesto and complicit as vote on my ideals rather than the specifics.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 11:20:39 GMT
There is talk that the EU may well remove the October 31 deadline which, at a stroke, takes away Johnson's threat and also shows the EU as being flexible, yet again, in giving the UK the time that it needs.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 13:46:53 GMT
Now Johnson is saying that if MPs try to block no deal that makes it more likely. Does he honestly think he's putting pressure on the EU; that no deal will be so much worse for them than for us that they won't dare let it happen? Or does he know that's nonsense but thinks everyone else is gullible enough to believe it? (If the latter it reminds me of my terrible first boss, who tried to convince staff that if he paid us more we'd have to pay more tax and end up taking home less money.)
I wouldn't be surprised if the EU does remove the deadline, simply out of pity.
|
|
311 posts
|
Post by olliebean on Aug 30, 2019 14:34:51 GMT
Johnson, though, has been absolutely adamant that we are leaving on the 31st October, and even if the EU remove that deadline, that may well not prevent Johnson from sticking to it, doubtless whilst excreting a cloud of rhetoric about the EU trying to keep us in their evil clutches for even longer.
Assuming he comes up with yet another ruse to prevent Parliament from stopping him, of course.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 17:36:48 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 17:36:48 GMT
Which - to go wider - brings me back to a point I’ve made repeatedly here: clarity. I believe Johnson is trying to provide that. Clarity on what, exactly? Unless I've missed it, he hasn't said anything about what his alternative proposals to the EU are/are going to be. It's for us to make those proposals - the EU owe us nothing, they have no obligation whatsoever to compromise and anyone who thinks they will buckle is frankly deluding themselves. So, if Boris hasn't told us what we are going to propose, then it seems to me that we have even less clarity than under the previous Prime Minister... We can certainly agree that May’s plan offered more detail than we’ve had so far from Johnson’s team. But MPs rejected it three times, throwing us into chaos and requiring an extension in which MPs have done...what, exactly? Er, not very much but squabble. Johnson saying ‘deal by 31 Oct or no deal’ offers clarity in that there’s a deadline to aim for. Both sides now need to work together pronto if they’re both serious about a deal. And it does seem that’s happening. This piece in the Guardian says it all, for me: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/29/parliament-brexit-prorogue-mps-alternative-no-deal
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Post by sf on Aug 30, 2019 18:19:09 GMT
Now Johnson is saying that if MPs try to block no deal that makes it more likely. Does he honestly think he's putting pressure on the EU; that no deal will be so much worse for them than for us that they won't dare let it happen? Or does he know that's nonsense but thinks everyone else is gullible enough to believe it My sense is that he will say literally anything if he thinks it'll keep him in Downing Street.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 19:23:13 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 19:23:13 GMT
We have a deadline to leave and it has been put back 7 months by some self serving politicians. Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Hopefully someone like Farage could launch a counter court action against the agitators.
Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech.
Typically we ha have had professional lackey and never elected Lord Adonis talking about another referendum luckily Martine Croxall rubbished his claims.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 20:00:34 GMT
We have a deadline to leave and it has been put back 7 months by some self serving politicians. Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Hopefully someone like Farage could launch a counter court action against the agitators. Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech.Typically we ha have had professional lackey and never elected Lord Adonis talking about another referendum luckily Martine Croxall rubbished his claims. I'm sorry but I beg to drastically disagree with you. Boris Johnson is in no way comparable to Martin Luther King, action, statement or otherwise.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Aug 30, 2019 20:11:15 GMT
We have a deadline to leave and it has been put back 7 months by some self serving politicians. Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Hopefully someone like Farage could launch a counter court action against the agitators. Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech. Typically we ha have had professional lackey and never elected Lord Adonis talking about another referendum luckily Martine Croxall rubbished his claims.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 20:13:39 GMT
Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech. What exactly do you think the objective is here? Because the objective ought to be to get the very best possible outcome for Britain, not to comply with an arbitrary deadline no matter what the cost. It's not courage and vision to take us out of the EU regardless of the consequences. It's completely losing the plot.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 20:14:29 GMT
We have a deadline to leave and it has been put back 7 months by some self serving politicians. Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Hopefully someone like Farage could launch a counter court action against the agitators. Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech. Typically we ha have had professional lackey and never elected Lord Adonis talking about another referendum luckily Martine Croxall rubbished his claims. Wonderfully* ironic quote *possibly the wrong word to use in this context.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 20:16:39 GMT
Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Gosh, for someone who is so vocal about the UK standing on its own you have quite an astonishing disregard for the rule of law and access to justice given you are resorting to childish name calling against people who are using a legitimate legal process to hold the government to account. Insults and bad points never help to win an argument.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 20:58:10 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 20:58:10 GMT
Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Gosh, for someone who is so vocal about the UK standing on its own you have quite an astonishing disregard for the rule of law and access to justice given you are resorting to childish name calling against people who are using a legitimate legal process to hold the government to account. Insults and bad points never help to win an argument. What Boris has done is within the law and what any PM can do. Major lead the Tories to their worse election result in 52 years so is a failed PM IMO.
|
|
2,342 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 21:00:32 GMT
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 30, 2019 21:00:32 GMT
We have a deadline to leave and it has been put back 7 months by some self serving politicians. Now a failed PM and busybody Windy Miller are going to court. Hopefully someone like Farage could launch a counter court action against the agitators. Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech.Typically we ha have had professional lackey and never elected Lord Adonis talking about another referendum luckily Martine Croxall rubbished his claims. I'm sorry but I beg to drastically disagree with you. Boris Johnson is in no way comparable to Martin Luther King, action, statement or otherwise. Wow Larry. Sarcasm?
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Post by sf on Aug 30, 2019 21:03:43 GMT
Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech. Sometimes it's so hard to hold on to the will to live.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 21:13:13 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 21:13:13 GMT
Boris has the balls and the vision to take us out of the EU and it was fitting he made his prorogation decision 56 years to the day that MLK made his similarly historic I have a dream speech. Sometimes it's so hard to hold on to the will to live. James Earl Ray thought the same dude.
|
|
952 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Aug 30, 2019 21:23:21 GMT
I think you might want to step away from the thread. You've soared wildly over the top and into quite offensive territory.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 30, 2019 22:32:39 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2019 22:32:39 GMT
|
|
4,008 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by d'James on Aug 30, 2019 23:04:00 GMT
Wow. A poll in the D**** M*** no less.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Aug 30, 2019 23:12:34 GMT
I completely believe that the country is closely divided. But the main thing your link really shows (unsurprisingly) is quite how untrustworthy the DM is: 1. The headline notes that “most voters think the Queen was RIGHT to approve his request”. While technically correct, this deliberately downplays the actual important result which is that 40% thought that boris shouldn’t have prorogued vs 39% who thought that he should have. I’m sure most people are aware of the difference, but just in case; the question about the queen is about the power that the royals have, whereas the the question about Boris is about proroguing. Indeed, comparing the two results makes it clear that a lot of those who feel that Boris should not have prorogued, didn’t think it would be right for the queen to be the one to stop it. 2. The survey explicitly asked about peoples’ views about Boris’ actions and 43% felt “Suspending parliament is a constitutional outrage” compared with 40% who felt “Suspending parliament is not a constitutional”. (Plus 0.1% who thought “Boris is like Martin Luther King” apparently!) 3. The article rather conveniently ignored the result of the question: “ Imagine there was a referendum tomorrow with the question 'Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?' How would you vote?” for which the answer was 50% remain, 45% leave. I’m sure there’s more, but all the data is online so I’d suggest anyone interested look it up directly rather than rely on the Daily Mail’s unsurprisingly questionable write-up.
|
|