4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jul 26, 2018 10:16:23 GMT
Someone who has unprotected sex with 3 strangers over the course of a very short time period is the very definition of slut or slapper or slag. You seem like fun. Notice you didn't describe any of her male partners in the same way - at least 2 of them were being just as sexually active and one of them was doing so while engaged. The other one subsequently realised that he is gay. You also ignore the fact that she appears to have been single ever since giving birth up until the end of Mamma Mia. So that's a grand total of three sexual partners in what, 20 years? |
|
494 posts
|
Post by ellie1981 on Jul 26, 2018 10:30:26 GMT
Someone who has unprotected sex with 3 strangers over the course of a very short time period is the very definition of slut or slapper or slag. I don't agree at all. As long as someone is being safe and they are not hurting themselves or anyone else, their body is their body, mind is their mind and they should be able to do whatever they please without judgement. She may of had sex with three men in a short space of time, but what if she had never had sex before or after? Is she still a slut then? Not to forget these fictional incidents happened in 1979 - pre AIDS era, so I guess protection wasn’t as much at the forefront of people’s minds then. |
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Jul 26, 2018 11:05:07 GMT
1. Meryl Streep can have as much sex with as many people in a weekend as she likes. 2. So can anyone else. Meryl Streep is one of the only women that could turn me straight. She is stunning! OI! Bloomin' cheek! You obviously ain't seen me, innit? |
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jul 26, 2018 11:05:41 GMT
1. Meryl Streep can have as much sex with as many people in a weekend as she likes. 2. So can anyone else. ![]()  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 11:11:43 GMT
1. Meryl Streep can have as much sex with as many people in a weekend as she likes. 2. So can anyone else. ![]() Form an orderly queue!! Also as I pointed out on twitter, in excellent film/theatre crossover Meryl has also f***ed an Angel with 8 vaginas played by Emma Thompson. If that’s what being a slut gets you sign me up 😉 |
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 26, 2018 11:34:58 GMT
“A man can sleep around, no questions asked, but if a woman makes nineteen or twenty mistakes she's a tramp.”  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 12:16:20 GMT
I prefer 'sociable' to 'slut' personally but three lots of boudoir shenanigans in a short space of time? Ah, the good old University days when one was very sociable.
Still, it was the hardest I worked at University AND I got a degree out of it (those tutors were so easy, literally). Win win all round methinks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 12:28:53 GMT
Meryl Streep is one of the only women that could turn me straight. She is stunning! OI! Bloomin' cheek! You obviously ain't seen me, innit? I am sure you are a beautiful creature... but Mezza Streep though! Her in Devil Wears Prada! I mean, damn! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 0:38:04 GMT
Tattoos are ghastly and in this hot weather, ever more are being revealed. When I was younger, it was only the occasional ex-naval person (and male) who might have one, and these were rarely seen anyway. In my long-term job, any staff who had a tattoo had to keep it concealed under clothing at work and anyone unable to meet this requirement would not have been employed in the first place. Now it seems like an epidemic and I can't say anything where I volunteer as about 50% of the staff seem to have tattoos - in some cases covering large areas such as arms, neck, etc. So, today at the beach a woman had a black line tattooed on the backs of her legs from her heels to the top of her thighs. Can someone please tell me what that’s all about? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 6:12:03 GMT
Tattoos are ghastly and in this hot weather, ever more are being revealed. When I was younger, it was only the occasional ex-naval person (and male) who might have one, and these were rarely seen anyway. In my long-term job, any staff who had a tattoo had to keep it concealed under clothing at work and anyone unable to meet this requirement would not have been employed in the first place. Now it seems like an epidemic and I can't say anything where I volunteer as about 50% of the staff seem to have tattoos - in some cases covering large areas such as arms, neck, etc. So, today at the beach a woman had a black line tattooed on the backs of her legs from her heels to the top of her thighs. Can someone please tell me what that’s all about? Isn't it to represent a stocking line? During the war women used to draw them on with a pencil to give the illusion that they were wearing stockings. |
|
27 posts
|
Post by catlover74 on Jul 27, 2018 6:19:36 GMT
So, today at the beach a woman had a black line tattooed on the backs of her legs from her heels to the top of her thighs. Can someone please tell me what that’s all about? Isn't it to represent a stocking line? During the war women used to draw them on with a pencil to give the illusion that they were wearing stockings. That would have been my guess too - although I wouldn't have known about it had I not once seen it done on an episode of Are You Being Served?. |
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 27, 2018 6:31:07 GMT
They would also stain their legs with gravy browning (which is just caramel really) to simulate the actual stocking, as well as drawing the line with an eyebrow pencil.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 6:41:43 GMT
Isn't it to represent a stocking line? During the war women used to draw them on with a pencil to give the illusion that they were wearing stockings. That would have been my guess too - although I wouldn't have known about it had I not once seen it done on an episode of Are You Being Served?. Yes, I thought that too but why would a youngish woman tattoo them on? In this day and age? But now I come to think of it while they were on the beach her friend put the woman’s hair in a French pleat (?) so perhaps she was one of those retro women like the character in Laura Wade’s play. Weird that I should see that when I have been thinking that Wade’s concept is ludicrous. The tattoo looked very strange. |
|
849 posts
|
Post by duncan on Jul 27, 2018 8:33:49 GMT
You also ignore the fact that she appears to have been single ever since giving birth up until the end of Mamma Mia. So that's a grand total of three sexual partners in what, 20 years? Most likely she picked up an STD and couldn't have further unprotected sex.
Sorry but I have no sympathy or empathy for someone who is such a slattern.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 8:37:14 GMT
They would also stain their legs with gravy browning (which is just caramel really) I thought gravy browning was beef stock, and caramel is melted sugar? Whatever you do don't confuse the two on Bake-Off!! |
|
1,064 posts
|
Post by bellboard27 on Jul 27, 2018 8:39:29 GMT
I thought gravy browning was beef stock, and caramel is melted sugar? Whatever you do don't confuse the two on Bake-Off!! Quite. Don't want to get the soggy bottoms confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 8:40:22 GMT
You also ignore the fact that she appears to have been single ever since giving birth up until the end of Mamma Mia. So that's a grand total of three sexual partners in what, 20 years? Most likely she picked up an STD and couldn't have further unprotected sex.
Sorry but I have no sympathy or empathy for someone who is such a slattern.
Even if your theory is correct and from the entire THREE men she slept with she go ALL the STDS in the world (It's possible, granted but statistically unlikely). Even then, she could still have sex you know? Most STDs are treatable, and given she was pregnant she was likely under a Doctor's care quite quickly and treated anything else she picked up. She could then quite happily carry on slutting around on Greek Islands as long as she liked. Except she didn't. Because that's the film plot. |
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 27, 2018 8:54:02 GMT
They would also stain their legs with gravy browning (which is just caramel really) I thought gravy browning was beef stock, and caramel is melted sugar? No, no. Gravy browning is purely for the purpose of colouring insipid looking gravy. There’s no meat in it. It’s made from burnt sugar i.e caramel. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 8:55:00 GMT
I thought gravy browning was beef stock, and caramel is melted sugar? No, no. Gravy browning is purely for the purpose of colouring insipid looking gravy. There’s no meat in it. It’s made from burnt sugar i.e caramel. oooh Mary Berry has spoken! (seriously though, fun fact, I didn't know that!) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 10:16:06 GMT
, fun fact, I didn't know that Me neither. Guess I was thinking of Oxo not Bisto or something. Funny how sugar can colour meat juice. We live and learn, and never say this board is anything other than educational. *snigger* meat juice. What? it's Friday, time for some tone-lowering |
|
471 posts
|
Post by mistressjojo on Jul 27, 2018 10:20:45 GMT
I thought gravy browning was beef stock, and caramel is melted sugar? No, no. Gravy browning is purely for the purpose of colouring insipid looking gravy. There’s no meat in it. It’s made from burnt sugar i.e caramel. And even though it's made from sugar, it's horrible in custard. As I found out when I mixed up Parisian Essence with Vanilla Essence in my Year 10 cooking practical. And had to eat it so the teacher didn't realise I'd stuffed up. |
|
1,089 posts
|
Post by tonyloco on Jul 27, 2018 11:21:03 GMT
Me neither. Guess I was thinking of Oxo not Bisto or something. Funny how sugar can colour meat juice. We live and learn, and never say this board is anything other than educational. Thanks monkey for reminding me of a Ken Dodd classic: "The show was very educational. Well, it taught me a lesson!" |
|
923 posts
|
Post by Snciole on Jul 27, 2018 12:02:44 GMT
It is really interesting that despite the film being released in 2008 they couldn't have Donna loving life and men in 1988 because it was all safe sex/scary AIDS 80s so had to say it was set in 90s.
|
|
923 posts
|
Post by Snciole on Jul 27, 2018 12:05:34 GMT
My unpopular opinion is that I think gender self-identification is going to get horribly exploited by men trying to get access to vulnerable women. I heard that if a woman wants to self identify as a man to claim any aristocracy titles then this isn't allowed, but there seems to no limit of men, who appear to be men (transgender are different but there is a whole other conversation on why and what gender even is) to infiltrate women's refuges, changing rooms or toilets (which are already limited and too full for women).
|
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 27, 2018 12:18:10 GMT
🥫
🐛 🐛
Open!
|
|
