155 posts
|
Post by bee on Apr 15, 2024 10:13:53 GMT
Show stop at todays show and a gasp in the audience as SJP looked worried, according to all that dazzles. I had the exact same at my show a few weeks ago, but with a loud thud in the audience as if someone had passed out. Did notice the savoy was a warm theatre. Does this happen a lot? When I went there was a show stop too (SJP look confused more than worried!) and they stretchered someone out. Before they could restart the show someone else collapsed! My companion and I agreed that if a third person went over we were leaving in case there was something in the air! Probably people finding out how much their partners paid for the tickets.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Apr 11, 2024 16:59:52 GMT
For me (roughly in order): The Motive and The Cue Uncle Vanya (Orange Tree) A Mirror 1979 (Finborough)
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Apr 11, 2024 5:37:16 GMT
I saw this last night and would pretty much echo Steve's review above. Greg Hicks is very good but the story doesn't really draw you in emotionally. Possibly the fact most of it is just a dream - as opposed to A Christmas Carol, where the things Scrooge sees are real (after a fashion) - means it doesn't connect so much. Having said that the applause at the end was very enthusiastic with a couple of people on their feet, so maybe I'm just an old cynic.
I really liked the venue, comfy seats with loads of leg room, and a really good rake.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Apr 2, 2024 8:28:16 GMT
I saw this last night. I had initially been put off by the high prices, but when they extended I caved and decided to go.
Anyway, I enjoyed it a lot. As others have said, it is a bit dated, but given that it explicity tells us the era in which it is set, that's fine. During the first act I did find myself sitting thinking "this isn't very funny", but it gradually became apparent that being funny wasn't the main point of the story so in an odd way I appreciated the earlier details of the story retrospectively.
The second and third acts were more straightforwardly funny and enjoyable with both leads doing a great job.
In summary, a really good night out (thankfully given the price of the tickets).
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 31, 2024 19:08:43 GMT
I literally bumped into Gordon Ramsey in WH Smiths at Glasgow Airport a few years ago.
I mean, it wasn't especially awkward, we both said "oh, sorry" simultaneously and went on our way, but it's my only real encounter with a proper celebrity so I figured I'd take the opportunity to tell folks about it on here.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 25, 2024 17:46:01 GMT
I'm going but not till mid-May.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 24, 2024 9:57:01 GMT
I saw yesterday's matinee of this. I really loved it, it might be the best Chekov production I've ever seen. I'd agree with the previous reviewers who picked out Madeleine Gray, she was spectacular - the final speech in particular was heartbreaking - but really the whole cast was fantastic. A great production.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 22, 2024 11:24:57 GMT
I was about to post that I saw it quite recently at the Old Vic with Kenneth Cranham and Rosamund Pike. Upon Googling the production I find that it was in 2007! I feel so old.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 20, 2024 15:32:35 GMT
The bar's completely shut at the moment. You enter the theatre via a door on the right-hand side of the building (if approaching from Earls Court tube station). From there, head upstairs for the box office and theatre, downstairs for the toilets.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 17, 2024 14:57:59 GMT
I tend to buy my tickets well in advance so reviews are almost never a factor for me.
I don't know if there's any single factor. The director can be a important for me, but more in the sense of there are some directors I avoid because I've seen enough of their work to know I don't like their style.
The play itself is the most important thing I guess, if it's a lesser known work by one of the great writers (Ibsen, Chekhov etc.), I'll almost certainly go for that even if I know nothing else about it. If it's a new play the subject matter is important, and it can also make a difference where it's being produced. I'm more likely to take a punt on something at one of the fringe theatres (with cheaper tickets) than if it's in the West End.
The actors involved don't matter so much - often I'll have bought my ticket before the cast has been announced - but I am a bit of a sucker for a star name if I haven't seen them before.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 17, 2024 13:23:14 GMT
This is a short (80 mins) two-hander about a middle-aged couple's deteriorating relationship during the Covid lockdown.
For the first half of this I was thinking it was a bit of a dud. The bickering between the husband and wife wasn't especially funny or entertaining, and was interspersed with scenes of them getting drunk together or just watching TV in silence. It was all just a bit too dull.
It did get a lot better in the second half as things took a nastier, and then a sadder turn. The ending was really quite moving.
Well acted by the two leads especially Kacey Ainsworth as Anne.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 16, 2024 17:37:44 GMT
Saw this afternoon's performance. I had a ticket for this at The Almeida but missed it due to a work trip, so glad to get the chance to catch it now. I thought it was fantastic. This sort of subject matter has been covered many times before, and to be frank this doesn't say much that hasn't been said already, but I still thought it was a great bit of theatre, engrossing and often very funny. My first time seeing JLM and he was a joy to watch.
I was worried about the 2 hours without a break but the seats at the Trafalgar Theatre are great, very comfortable with loads of leg room. If this had been at the old Trafalgar Studios it would've been torture.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 14, 2024 14:37:50 GMT
Thanks for the heads up. Just bought a ticket. While I was on I also got a ticket for The Government Inspector, which they are doing in May/June.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Mar 6, 2024 6:30:18 GMT
Edward Bond has died at 89. Personally I can only remember seeing two of his plays, The Sea (with Eileen Atkins and David Haig) and Bingo (with Patrick Stewart and Richard McCabe). Both were OK, and featured some great performances, but also had a lot of heavy-handed preaching. Looking at his Wikipedia, he certainly seems to have had a bit of a tempestuous career.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Feb 25, 2024 12:10:33 GMT
I saw this yesterday. I guess it probably helps going in with low expectations, but I actually thought this wasn't so bad. As has already been said, there's not lot goes on for the first two-thirds or so, in a sense the same course of events get repeated a number of times, but I can't say I was bored. I thought the acting was generally of a high standard with Ella Schrey-Yeats chewing the scenery pretty impressively as Janet. Eventually a bit of back story emerges and we get an explanation for why Maurice is so interested in the case, but unfortunately there's no real resolution, it just sort of ends.
Audience seemed to like it, enthusiastic applause at the end.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Feb 19, 2024 22:31:51 GMT
There's the Coronet in Notting Hill. Not sure if it counts as being in Kensington but it's not too far away. They seem to have moved away from "normal" theatre in recent years though, concentrating more on dance and poetry.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Feb 11, 2024 18:58:27 GMT
Saw this yesterday. Thought it was marvellous, really quite exhilarating at times.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Feb 11, 2024 0:32:56 GMT
This is quite an odd adaptation of the Jane Austen story, carried off with lots of energy and commitment by the three-person cast. It's not really a spoof but there are lots of funny moments and many of the characters are played so as to be ridiculous stereotypes. In a way it reminded me somewhat of The Tragedy of Madame Bovary from Jermyn Street last year.
It does have one particular plot twist which isn't in the book, and which leads to a couple of quite poignant scenes, and I found the ending a bit confusing. On the whole though, I enjoyed it. Three and a half to four stars from me.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 24, 2024 11:44:01 GMT
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 15, 2024 23:50:34 GMT
Martin Jarvis was in the row in front of me at The Homecoming tonight.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 15, 2024 23:48:11 GMT
I really struggled with this. The characters' behaviour is so strange, and the dialogue between them so bizarre, that none of it feels even close to being real. Thus it was hard for me to care at all.
It might be me though, I don't think I really "get" Pinter.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 13, 2024 23:33:37 GMT
I thought this was marvellous. A brisk run through a short but important episode in Canadian history, really well played by a three person cast. Samantha Coughlan in particular was brilliant in a number of different roles. I suppose in a way the screens providing the background context were a bit of a cop out, it should be the playwrights job to include all of that within the text, but I suspect that would have led to a much longer, duller play.
4, maybe even 4.5 stars from me.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 7, 2024 12:07:45 GMT
I saw yesterday's matinee. There's much to admire in this, the staging is great and the actors give heartfelt, powerful performances. However I never really found myself caring all that much. Zula and Viktor aren't very likeable, and we only get hints about their back-stories to help explain why they are such flawed people. A shame really, like I say so much of it is really good.
Musically I felt it was a bit of a non-event. The songs are fine as far as they go but they're not especially memorable. I'd also agree with those who have said that this isn't really a musical, it's more a play with songs.
Like others I did think the amount of smoking on stage was excessive. I know the play covers a time period when almost everybody smoked but I think we can sort of take that as a given, we don't need to see it. Having said thatI can't say it especially caused me an issue with coughing ot whatever, possibly it's more of a problem for people upstairs?
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Jan 7, 2024 10:54:54 GMT
Saw this yesterday, and I thought the acting was great, especially from Nancy Carroll in her double role, and some scenes worked extremely well. But the play never quite came together as a whole. It kept cutting between Cambridge and Prague, and the Cambridge characters frankly aren't all that interesting, while the Prague scenes are full of references to Czech politics of the 1960s-1980s that Stoppard doesn't stop to explain to the audience. I feel like Stoppard wanted to make a play of ideas, with Czech dissident Jan and his Cambridge mentor Marxist historian Max as the two main poles in a dialectic. But Max is so obviously a pompous creep--probably more so than Stoppard realizes--that it's hard to take any of his ideas seriously. I saw this last night and prefab's review pretty much sums up my feelings about it. The actors are all fine, but the play itself just isn't very good. The Prague based scenes are interesting and you start to care about what happens there, but everyone in Cambridge comes across as pretentious and spoilt, especially Max, who is just awful really. I couldn't really see the point of all the Syd Barrett related stuff either, it didn't have any real relevance to the main story, it felt like it was just padding out the text.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 31, 2023 0:26:39 GMT
I saw this tonight and would agree with the general opinion on here. It's great fun and a brilliant night out.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 30, 2023 18:20:15 GMT
Yes, I'm going to this. Like you suggest, I know nothing at all about the real story behind it but I like to support Finborough when I can. They've produced an odd range of stuff over the last year or so, most of which I've liked so I'll give this a shot.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 30, 2023 18:13:02 GMT
I'd pretty much agree with the last couple of reviews. I enjoyed this a lot. It starts pretty slowly but as soon as Louisa Harland appears it hits its stride. To some extent the other two actors, while both excellent, are playing easily recognisable stereotypes, but Harland's character provides a less often heard point of view as well as getting most of the funny one liners. Four stars from me.
I think some folks are being a bit hard on the venue, it was OK, other than the horribly uncomfortable seats.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 29, 2023 15:57:05 GMT
that one was brilliant! I am still hoping it will come back sometime It was scheduled for the chocolate factory wasnt it? They need a hit and to put some bums on those padded benches It did go ahead at the Chocolate Factory, having transferred there from Chichester. After its success there it was scheduled for a West End run in 2020.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 20, 2023 19:18:56 GMT
The Hampstead production of Dumb Waiter did in fact go ahead, I saw it. Seating was still socially distanced at the time. Oh did it ? That’s odd, they gave me a credit note when it was originally postponed, I must have missed the news of its return. Yes, looking back at the reviews now it was supposed to run from early December 2020 till the end of January 2021. I'm guessing the run must have got cut short when full lockdown got reintroduced for Christmas 2020.
|
|
155 posts
|
Post by bee on Dec 20, 2023 11:33:34 GMT
I guess it depends how long a view you want to take: in our lifetimes, i imagine theyll be constant revivals of Pinter. Dumb Waiter seems to get a london revivial every year or so! Ive seen 4 different homecomings in london for example in the last 12 years or so for example Yes Dumb Waiter is a good call for one with staying power - Hampstead were planning a production of it which was cancelled due to Covid but it has never reappeared. But fashion will turn against Pinter just as it did against Rattigan and Osborne and that can happen at any time. The Hampstead production of Dumb Waiter did in fact go ahead, I saw it. Seating was still socially distanced at the time.
|
|