|
Post by talkingheads on May 28, 2019 14:10:14 GMT
At a loose end tomorrow and this is the only play I really want to see, so going to try for day seats from the box office. Never done this before, so for those who have, how early is advisable to get there? If the box office opens at 10 I was thinking half 9? Also what kind of seats do you get?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2019 5:54:41 GMT
We got seats yesterday - I was with my mum and went past about 4pm, and she suddenly said she'd like to see it, and they offered us stalls row J or dress circle somewhere for £30. Went for stalls which was fine apart from a very tall person in front of her.
I thought it was really good. Giles Terera was the best for me, but I enjoyed it much more than the other Ibsen I've seen previously.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2019 5:57:12 GMT
The star for me was the set and lighting design, I thought it was really stunning.
|
|
|
Post by bgarde on May 31, 2019 7:31:35 GMT
This was definitely one of the best plays I've seen in a while, all performances were super and the only thing that grated slightly were the audience's knowing belly laughs to the political quips. It's something that will stay with me for a while - the sense of mood and melancholy.
I was in the stalls at D1 with a restricted view although caught 99% of everything - more than fine if you don't want to pay full whack.
|
|
2,953 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Jun 3, 2019 12:16:50 GMT
Are the front row £15 only on sale on the day? That's the impression I get whenever I look (today has 6 available at the mo, but none for any later date).
|
|
5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 5, 2019 9:30:32 GMT
I’ve twice attempted to review this here and twice my wonderful prose has flicked off and disappeared. So here it is: Brilliant More in West End please Acting fab, all of ‘em Class production.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Jun 5, 2019 9:51:39 GMT
I’ve twice attempted to review this here and twice my wonderful prose has flicked off and disappeared. So here it is: Brilliant More in West End please Acting fab, all of ‘em Class production. Darn it, I'm interested to know what you said Lynette. Glad you enjoyed it, I went back to see it again it was so good.
|
|
5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 5, 2019 14:53:39 GMT
I think I would also like to see it again. Trying not to flick a wrong thing here .... What I was saying was that I think Hayley Atwell will become one of our acting dames at this rate, so good. I loved Tom Burke, who wouldn’t? And I would love to see Giles Terera in more classics. Lucy Briers made it look easy but her clarity, timing etc made the link clear between the past and the present. And I hope she starts to get the older woman classic roles now. I loved the way they didn’t stint on the servants. It made it real, the gap between Rosmer’s idealism and his reality. I loved the lighting, the set, the way the set was handled, the chair, the sound effects and the special effect at the end which was possible in a modern production but which was well written in so no doubts there. I loved all the water...in the text and some added in as they took drinks. I loved that they didn’t rush the long speeches both the political and the emotional. Yes, a few laughs at the political but actually I think the audience realised it was seeing something special here, a bloke saw it all over a hundred years ago and found the way to express it. What we need is that way and that recognition. No wonder Ibsen is called the father of modern drama. And didn’t he like the nuances, something of Othello in the way a man comes along and destroys a couple with revelations based on a falsity, here a false morality. More please in the west end. I paid 65 for the ticket, well worth it. I was at the end of row G, just in from row F end with the restricted view but actually if this is cheaper go for it. I say the west end because the NT has obviously given up on this kind of production, the un messed about with classic that still has plenty to tell us and which show how brilliant and how deep our acting talent it.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Jun 5, 2019 17:21:28 GMT
Thank you for taking the time to type that out a third time lynette I quite agree with your thoughts. It's rare to get a production where everything is so good and compliments each other. Beautiful lighting and set. Acting soo good but made to look easy. Hayley Atwell is just wonderful and yes consistently good, could be for me something I can say I saw when they for ages out and hopefully through a long career like others do for our distinguished dames. I loved her scenes with Lucy Briefs who surely deserves more prominent rules. And servants who were believably real formed characters, I loved the interactions between them all, so much set without lines. Thinking about it makes me smile.
|
|
53 posts
|
Post by nialld on Jun 8, 2019 11:00:29 GMT
Are the front row £15 only on sale on the day? That's the impression I get whenever I look (today has 6 available at the mo, but none for any later date). Just to clarify in regards to this - is it the case that they're £20 if you get them as day seats from the box office in person, but £15 when they put the unsold ones online?
|
|
2,953 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Jun 8, 2019 11:58:32 GMT
£15 when they put the unsold ones online? I just looked at the official website one Monday and there were several front row tix at £15. Maybe there's a booking fee on top of that, maybe it's cheaper earlier in the week, I haven't checked back and didn't book (I don't live in London).
|
|
2,345 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Jun 8, 2019 20:52:25 GMT
Saw this today. I'll echo everyone else in saying it's excellent and well worth watching
|
|
4,458 posts
|
Post by poster J on Jun 9, 2019 8:45:12 GMT
Agreed, I thought this was very good - great performances all round (even viewed from the cheap seats!) and the ending was very effective. Yes, the audience laughter was annoying in parts but at times you did just have to laugh as the dialogue is so prophetic of the political mess we are currently in.
|
|
|
Post by happytobehere on Jun 14, 2019 21:40:31 GMT
I saw this tonight, without any prior knowledge of the story, and it honestly feels like it could’ve been written yesterday. It’s uncannily accurate.
The entire thing flew by & it was all so engaging. The whole cast were fantastic but it’d be a crime not to give a specific mention to Hayley Atwell. I’ve long thought her to be an underrated actress, and now i’m even more sure. She’s incredible.
Was sat on the far side of row D, restricted view. Only cost £25 on Todaytix & was a total bargain. You do miss a bit on the right side of the stage, but not very much, basically just a door & a window. Well worth it to be that close to the stage.
|
|
|
Post by edi on Jun 15, 2019 19:05:18 GMT
I saw it last week and it was excellent.
I got one of the online day seats. Each day around 11 am the unsold day seats are available online. These are £15 plus around £3.65 booking fee. So for two tickets it cost £16.83 per ticket. Bargain for this play. The day I booked there were 6 such tickets available.
|
|
1,001 posts
|
Post by David J on Jun 15, 2019 20:11:54 GMT
It was crazy watching the final scene after reading the news about Oberlin University being charged at least 33 million dollars for accusing a local bakery of racism and inciting protest and vandalism on the company. A family business that has lasted decades surviving the great depression and so on
Boy does Ibsen seem to resonate today
|
|
1,001 posts
|
Post by David J on Jun 15, 2019 22:01:18 GMT
Tom Burke and Hayley Atwell give first class performances. So naturalistic and they play off each other beautifully
Giles Terrera not so much but he’s still enjoyable to watch. Peter Wright was straight up acting with big hand gestures and so on. Great performance from the lighthouse publisher and the housemaid though
But otherwise a play that even 100 years ago could predict the current political climate were in. Great production values and acting all round
Go see
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on Jun 16, 2019 6:32:33 GMT
I'm hard pressed to think of a better, more powerful production of any Ibsen play I've seen. As of this morning this ranks at number one for me.
BTW we watched it from a Circle box. Price £30, just £10 more than a day seat. It's a side angle view, of course, but we didn't miss much and one can lean out without blocking any one else. Plus, at the Duke of York's, they throw in a goody basket - sparkling wine, chocolates, crisps, etc. I'd sit there again in a heartbeat.
|
|
4,588 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Jun 18, 2019 6:41:06 GMT
Add me to the list of lovers of this production and who is awe of how topical this.
|
|
352 posts
|
Post by lichtie on Jun 18, 2019 18:47:19 GMT
My first TodayTix ticket for this last night, and worth it for a very good row C view. Good performances, but as with much Ibsen, the characters feel rather forced in their rigidity when viewed with modern eyes...
|
|
8 posts
|
Post by hedda4897 on Jun 22, 2019 18:05:42 GMT
I love Ibsen. I thought this was the best play I have seen so far this year.
|
|
3,470 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jun 23, 2019 3:21:27 GMT
I went yesterday on the strength of the favourable comments here: was able to book F1 stalls for £15 the day before - well, supposedly £15 apart from the ATG booking fee battle - which was presumably dynamic pricing working in my favour. Great seat as it's on the aisle and though sold as restricted view, isn't really for this production.
Seeing this meant breaking (or bending, as my first Rosmersholm) my "No more Ibsen" rule, which for this production was probably worth it as it was indeed so good. I did however find Rebecca West's views almost implausibly modern compared to some of those around her and the ending left me wondering what the point of the play was. I wasn't too keen on Tom Burke's interpretation either but can't claim he wasn't suitably lugubrious.
|
|
893 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Jun 25, 2019 21:30:16 GMT
Loved this, comfortably the best thing in the West End right now.
Though the play itself is perhaps not quite as strong as his more famous works as it gets a little muddled at times it's astonishingly topical and the production itself is top notch.
There's not really a weak link in the cast, Burke is good in the less interesting of the main roles and Giles Terera and Lucy Briers both shine in support, though it took me longer than it should have to recognise her from the BBC Pride & Prejudice!
But the stand out has to be Hayley Atwell. An actress I've always admired but one who, despite some strong stage roles, I thought better suited to TV and Film where she lights up the screen. Here though she brings all that charisma while finding new depths in performance, you can't not watch her.
|
|
578 posts
|
Post by ncbears on Jun 26, 2019 13:54:34 GMT
Just to confirm that this is not a translation of Ibsen - it is an adaptation so some of the more "topical" references are not actually Ibsen.
|
|
416 posts
|
Post by schuttep on Jul 1, 2019 8:54:00 GMT
Just to confirm that this is not a translation of Ibsen - it is an adaptation so some of the more "topical" references are not actually Ibsen. Thank you ggersten for pointing out the difference between the two. I'd never thought about the choice of words having such a difference. I love that, even in my dotage, I can learn something new. Loved this production btw; Hayley Atwell was a revelation, having never seen her before in anything. But a largely wonderful cast and with a great coup de theatre at the end.
|
|
|
Post by orchidman on Jul 3, 2019 0:30:59 GMT
This was enjoyable, with stand-out performances from Atwell and Terera but the idea that it is topical mystifies me.
Okay, so we have a divisive election between conservatives and progressives in which we know absolutely nothing of the policies proposed or actual likely consequences. Which could be basically anytime anywhere across human history for as long as there have been elections. You would think Ibsen had invented the idea of equality as a political goal the way he is getting praised here. Whereas in the UK right now the most striking part of the milieu to me is that the self-declared conservatives are acting like cultish radicals, which is not the case in this play at all. A conservative politician says the people not voting for him have been duped to vote against their interests, wink at the audience, but again that's something politicians might say about voters whose vote they have lost at practically any time - and in our time it is more likely a liberal politician, here and in the US, who would voice that grievance. What is the relevant material then? That politics is divisive? Um, yeah.
First half of the first half very good and atmospheric, second half of the first half gets rather repetitive. First half of the second half it really kicks into gear, second half of the second half it tails off into melodrama.
In that section I found the character of Rebecca, her actions, declared motivations and psychology not very believable, unhuman in how she seems to be weighing up the balance between her ideals and emotions. Yes, of course there are such tensions but mainly on a subconscious level, the way she is processing them out loud just didn't ring true to me.
The idea that her admitting to him that she may have psychologically facilitated the suicide would thus rid him of any guilt is absolutely bizarre. He's still the husband who has been emotionally unfaithful with another woman under the same roof as his wife. That she would risk her standing with him to make that admission makes it even weirder. Then her explanation of why she refused his proposal of marriage lost me yet further, there is no tension between her ideals and emotions if she has converted Rosmer to her ideals, yet the play acts as if there is. I would also have liked a greater sense of the history of the relationship between Rosmer and his wife, whether they were ever truly affectionate, or it was simply a convenient marriage of social equals in a small society.
Still plenty to like but a long way from a 5 star show for me. Always pleased to see a classy production of a serious play in the West End without any stupid gimmickry.
|
|
|
Post by westendgurl on Jul 19, 2019 12:44:23 GMT
I finally got round to seeing this last night and it was a bit blooming good wasn't it?! Loved how topical it was and thought the performances were brilliant. Absolutely loved the ending, I wish I'd have seen this earlier in the run now so I could go back and see it all again, and avoid the front few rows!
|
|
|
Post by juicy_but_terribly_drab on Jul 20, 2019 21:28:49 GMT
I decided to see this along with Sweat today since it was their last days and I hadn't gotten round to it yet. For whatever reason I didn't think I'd enjoy either but I was pleasantly surprised in both cases. This was especially surprising in how funny it was. I was also swept up in the melodrama of it all and its chilling final moments when the water creeps in were very effective and unexpected. Brilliantly acted and far more engaging than I had expected (although the view was less than stellar as I was in D 21 in the Upper Circle so missed a lot of action on the right of the stage in Act 1 especially).
|
|
3,045 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jul 20, 2019 22:22:27 GMT
Now that it's over, could someone please describe the theatrical coup at the end, in spoilers if necessary. With much regret, I didn't get to see this, and would dearly have liked to.
|
|
3,070 posts
|
Post by david on Jul 20, 2019 23:06:13 GMT
{Spoiler - click to view} In the final scene, the stage floor gets covered in water. Now that it's over, could someone please describe the theatrical coup at the end, in spoilers if necessary. With much regret, I didn't get to see this, and would dearly have liked to.
|
|