2,962 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 9:52:26 GMT
most of the parents would struggle to find the money to pay any portion of it. Don't they do any young person schemes? Many theatres have special offers and even free performances designed to get young people through the doors. Maybe there are other issues coming into play - health and safety type stuff? - that make it a bit of a headache for schools. My school was clearly very skint (geography books with maps of countries that no longer existed, English books with names of teachers in the front from when they were girls, music room books dated 1906, desks with inkwells, lessons in prefabs) and in one of the poorest parts of the country but we still managed theatre trips, locally and all the way to London to the NT.
|
|
530 posts
|
Post by jek on Mar 5, 2019 10:32:21 GMT
crowblack I'm told by someone who works at the school that all avenues were explored - and I know that there are all sorts of subsidies and schemes (including a borough wide scheme called Every Child A Theatregoer which has now fallen foul of austerity cuts) - but nothing could bridge the gap. Have to say though that as I walk past Stratford East most days I see plenty of school groups queuing up to go in during panto time so maybe it is just a question of schools choosing which activities to prioritise/ask parents for money for. Can't imagine it's a health and safety concern as the kids are taken to swimming, museum trips and the like. As a one time parent helper getting a kid into a local theatre seat would be a lot less stress than wrangling them onto the tube (there is always one kid who has never been on an escalator) and then trying not to lose them in the science museum.
|
|
2,962 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 10:44:04 GMT
schools choosing which activities to prioritise/ There may be a Catch 22 here - schools thinking "well, why bother taking them if we're pressed for time? Theatre, film, TV is dominated by the middle and upper classes so they wouldn't have a chance to get into it anyway". And thus it remains "not for the likes of them" There may also be cultural / language issues and objections. I do know some teachers with that attitude, including a teacher friend in a very low income area told off by the head for telling kids about Spain "because none of these children will ever go there".
|
|
530 posts
|
Post by jek on Mar 5, 2019 11:22:39 GMT
crowblack I know what you mean - I grew up in the East End in the 1970s when all sorts of things were 'not for the likes of us' (the only theatre trip we ever went to with school was to see a production of Pygmalion at the local university settlement - Toynbee Hall. No doubt a well meaning attempt to bring us some culture with a message but we were just put out that there were no songs - someone must have mentioned My Fair Lady to us in connection with the trip.) But I know that the school in question also has at points in the year run out of blue tack to display children's work - funds are that short. As for cultural 'fit' the Stratford East panto is as multicultural as the schools it performs for. There are - of course - no easy answers to any of this. And of course access to any sort of culture is much easier if you live in a major city and can take advantage of free TFL fares for school parties etc.
|
|
2,962 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 12:15:04 GMT
And of course access to any sort of culture is much easier if you live in a major city and can take advantage of free TFL fares for school parties etc. Yes, if you live in a rural or even suburban area it's difficult. I grew up on the rural outskirts but went to an inner city school (neighbour with big car dropped us in on the way to work) and if I wanted to see a show or go to the arts cinema I'd take a change of clothes and get the bus into the city centre or train to Manchester after school: friends joked about my special rucksack I'd bring in when I had something to go to.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Mar 5, 2019 17:49:33 GMT
Nicholas. I know we can’t afford books and libraries anymore. And I know taking kids from school to theatres is difficult. But we should try. Interesting development re boos: bookshelves at tube stations by me, northern line. You can give and you can take, all sorts, some for kids. Brilliant idea I think. So you can get your kid to read a book on the tube instead of staring into space while you fiddle with your phone ( not you, but the woman on the train the other day opposite me. I was so annoyed I was about to start a conversation with the kid but then you can be hauled off to prison for less) Endeavour, best thing on tv. I wasn’t aware of any snob thing about it? Was that because it is on ITV? When I was a kid, ITV was a bit 'common' to use Alan Bennet's word that his mum used. Ah, those were the days 😂 Oh yes Lynette, think we are of similar vintage. We didnt watch Itv in my house til i was at secondary school. Remember other boys in my class talking about programmes id never heard of!
|
|
2,706 posts
|
Post by Cardinal Pirelli on Mar 5, 2019 19:01:13 GMT
Nicholas. I know we can’t afford books and libraries anymore. And I know taking kids from school to theatres is difficult. But we should try. Interesting development re boos: bookshelves at tube stations by me, northern line. You can give and you can take, all sorts, some for kids. Brilliant idea I think. So you can get your kid to read a book on the tube instead of staring into space while you fiddle with your phone ( not you, but the woman on the train the other day opposite me. I was so annoyed I was about to start a conversation with the kid but then you can be hauled off to prison for less) Endeavour, best thing on tv. I wasn’t aware of any snob thing about it? Was that because it is on ITV? When I was a kid, ITV was a bit 'common' to use Alan Bennet's word that his mum used. Ah, those were the days 😂 Oh yes Lynette, think we are of similar vintage. We didnt watch Itv in my house til i was at secondary school. Remember other boys in my class talking about programmes id never heard of! The opposite for me, ITV was the default, the BBC rarely got a look in. As for the fabled BBC2, only when the cricket, Wimbledon or something similar was on. When we got a portable in the kitchen, when I was about twelve or so, I could then go and watch things that I wanted to. So much of my education came from television - The World at War, Disappearing World, World in Action (plus other programmes without world in the title....)
|
|
2,706 posts
|
Post by Cardinal Pirelli on Mar 5, 2019 19:23:22 GMT
These days, and going by various TV documentaries - that recent series on BBC2, for example, I do find it rather hard to believe that schools are in fact strapped for cash. To me, it seemed far more like they were strapped for common sense and commercial organisational ability. To see about 3 layers of non-teaching management and massive duplication of simple administrative roles, and particularly an "executive head" swanning about in a flash car on a 6 figure salary that makes the Prime Minister look like someone recently switched to Universal Benefit was unbelievable. Then they showed the state of the classrooms and talked about how many teachers were being sacked. #joinedupthinking. This is the real problem. The cash is there, but everybody in teaching is more worried about Ofsted's latest PC measurement and meeting that, than they are about teaching anything at all; and when they do get to teach, performing arts and other expensive subjects that don't show up in league tables get least attention. Scary. Schools chosen to be on documentaries are not particularly representative, they make for good television, though. There is a real issue with rampant administration, however, being constructed via layer upon layer of government demands. Change the whole culture of governments making changes, then new changes, then updates of those changes and the need to show that these are being implemented, run and monitored and those sort of executive roles will shrivel away. Yet, the consumers we are told want that level of oversight. It’s the usual problem - people want lower taxes and higher spending, increased efficiency yet greater oversight, having cake and eating cake. They are incompatible demands.
|
|
2,706 posts
|
Post by Cardinal Pirelli on Mar 5, 2019 20:17:05 GMT
a similar knock-on effect was seen in South Wales as the mines and factories closed Yes - I think a case of factories not only giving security but also to a degree a cultural hub with the Workers' Educational Association and performances (Mum said Kathleen Ferrier performed at Dunlops, while C. Day Lewis - Daniel's dad - came to their school.). Related to the Mark Thomas programme (thank you, I'll seek it out) I remember Mark Steel - I think - saying once that his Mum thought "BBC2 isn't for the likes of us" ! TV scheduling used to be amazing: I've probably said this before, but the listings read like BFI South Bank film programming, arts shows at reasonable hours of the day showed clips from current stage productions, there were lengthy interviews with writers etc. (I hope old Arenas and Omnibuses turn up on the new BBC streaming service). It felt like there was a genuinely concerted effort to reach out, educate and inform: the arts are for everyone, not hidden behind a paywall. The main channels have become much less keen on educating, that’s for sure. Post the second world war there wa a realisation that the people who did so much to ensure its success deserved to be treated as intelligent human beings, not just cannon fodder. That has withered to virtually nothing now. Regarding television, the idea that the current populist trend in programming is ‘giving people what they want’ is patronising and short sighted, the strength of a nation is built from the ground up and our collective lack of knowledge about the world and how it works alongside not being given the tools to make informed decisions leads inevitably to our current situation. How can we prosper if voters have no concept of trade and economics for example? It may serve politicians to have a populus who are supposed to just trust them but the rising lack of that trust is vastly amplified because lack of knowledge creates a people who have become too reliant on others who do not have their interests at heart, who are thus volatile and who are capable of self destruction. It’s a truism that a team is only as strong as its weakest link and, as a result, we are a damaged nation.
|
|
1,846 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Mar 5, 2019 20:40:00 GMT
We have the most educated generation in history, I have a lot of faith in the current generation as demonstrated by the climate change action.
The issues we have now is more the ignorance and selfishness of my generation and the preceding retired babyboomers who had the educative media when we were growing up.
|
|
5,586 posts
|
Post by lynette on Mar 5, 2019 21:02:02 GMT
O Neil, it's not my fault. When I was a kid there were still plenty of us with outside loos and the only hearing was a coal fire in one room. Ok, so I personally had an inside toilet, you'll be delighted to know but my general point is that the baby boomers were very much post war babies. It is impossible to convey the feeling of the time. Huge progress, national health service, and also fear, Suez crisis when my own dad would have been eligible for a call up to the army if war had broken out, and the BOMB. That our parents took us to the Theatre was a miriacle. That they valued education wonderful though mine didn’t know anything about libraries. A friend took me to a library for the first time when I was twelve. I don’t know when it all went wrong, when the 'dumbing down' began.
|
|
1,846 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Mar 5, 2019 21:38:07 GMT
I think what I was trying to convey is that despite the obvious positive changes which have happened something has changed and the ‘Daily Mail’ mentality has become the pervasive one for a majority of a generation.
Back to, Is British Education Guilty of Failing... is the part that I cannot reconcile, we are allegedly dumber but more educated or is it schooled.
I hope it is educated and we can feel the benefit of the policy making a difference in the coming years.
One thing that I can ask, what was the mix of Theatre goers in the 70’s, 80’s, photographs seem to indicate a similarity to now,
is it just 18-25 clubbing / gigs / finding life partner etc , little time and inclination for sitting quietly in the dark. 25-45 raising a family / TV primary interaction with drama 45 - lessening of family commitments and gravitation towards Theatre for drama even though rarely as a treat.
Sweeping generalisations I know, with the obvious Theatrical bias of a Theatre Forum are we projecting our interests and not really seeing things are carrying on as they always were and the changes we want are happening on the Stage at the moment and as this more open and diverse generation reach the ‘Theatre’ phase this will be reflected in the audience.
|
|
2,706 posts
|
Post by Cardinal Pirelli on Mar 6, 2019 1:17:24 GMT
We have the most educated generation in history, I have a lot of faith in the current generation as demonstrated by the climate change action. The issues we have now is more the ignorance and selfishness of my generation and the preceding retired babyboomers who had the educative media when we were growing up. I fully agree about babyboomers (and I came in just after, according to how they categorise these things). There is a big difference between a younger generations understanding of a limited number of issues, however, against a lack of wider understanding (I speak as a teacher, so with a fair degree of experience of this). The way that education has been forced to teach to the exam means that education is deep in certain areas yet limited in scope. On who attends theatre, I do think that there are more younger people in audiences now; partly through efforts regarding this but also because theatre has become more diverse. There are times, when attending immersive events for example, when the average audience age is much, much, lower than in general.
|
|
2,962 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 6, 2019 9:04:55 GMT
attending immersive events for example, when the average audience age is much, much, lower I genuinely think youngsters hate the idea of sitting still and not being on their phones for any long period of time - certainly they don't want to switch them off in cinemas!
|
|
2,962 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 6, 2019 9:39:07 GMT
It's also far far easier to book tickets than it was when I was young - then we had to phone up, send a cheque off by post and had no idea about the quality of the seats we'd bought. Celebrity casting is theoretically a great way to get people into a theatre for the first time - the first things I booked for and went to see with schoolfriends were some acts we'd seen on the TV. Crucially, though, the tickets were cheap. If your first experience of theatre is going "oh wow, my favourite TV actor is in a play" and then discovering the stalls are £125 each and even the back of the circle is £75, while an interval drink also costs a small fortune you very quickly get the impression this isn't for the likes of you. Cheap offers for children are not much good if a parent has to pay that much to accompany them.
|
|