5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Aug 2, 2016 13:30:03 GMT
Peggs, what is a noisy beard? Don't reply if it is rude! I'll get into trouble.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Aug 2, 2016 18:30:25 GMT
Peggs, what is a noisy beard? Don't reply if it is rude! I'll get into trouble. Sorry, late night typing is not remotely comprehensible, not at all rude, you are quite safe, he was a very scratchy man and his stubbly beard sat in front row seats so very close to my ear. was very noisy when scratched for what seemed an excessive amount of time for presumably an itch.
|
|
209 posts
|
Post by Flim Flam on Aug 2, 2016 18:53:21 GMT
Well done Lynette. I also wanted to know, but was too scared to ask...
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Aug 2, 2016 21:04:29 GMT
Well done Lynette. I also wanted to know, but was too scared to ask... I feel I should have had a more interesting response now.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 16:11:38 GMT
If this were to transfer, where could it go?
|
|
441 posts
|
Post by theatreliker on Aug 4, 2016 16:34:44 GMT
Depends if they're willing to wait a bit. Otherwise, the Phoenix for a very limited run? Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't transfer.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:33:26 GMT
Depends if they're willing to wait a bit. Otherwise, the Phoenix for a very limited run? Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't transfer. I too thought the Phoenix but wasn't sure as the run doesn't end until Sperember smd Phoenix is free from August. I think that would be a good theatre and should fit the set or majority of it? I think it would be a smart move for them to transfer it for a limited time and put it in a theatre this size because it's sold out mainly now at the NT and Helen McCrory is an amazing actress!
|
|
6,285 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Aug 4, 2016 19:59:19 GMT
I'd probably think the Wyndham's after No Man's Land, keep in mind they don't have to transfer straight away.
I'm thinking it'll be either Ross or JCSS for the Phoenix
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:14:05 GMT
I'd probably think the Wyndham's after No Man's Land, keep in mind they don't have to transfer straight away. I'm thinking it'll be either Ross or JCSS for the Phoenix Yeah I too thought Wyndhams would be a good choice. I do hope it transfers, it would do well I think in the West End
|
|
816 posts
|
Post by stefy69 on Aug 5, 2016 6:47:36 GMT
I'd probably think the Wyndham's after No Man's Land, keep in mind they don't have to transfer straight away. I'm thinking it'll be either Ross or JCSS for the Phoenix Yeah I too thought Wyndhams would be a good choice. I do hope it transfers, it would do well I think in the West End Yes I agree totally it deserves another run and being selfish I want to see it again !
I'm still keeping everything crossed for Ross going into the Phoenix.....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2016 10:10:11 GMT
Well. I found this pleasant but not much more I'm afraid. All the way through it, I found myself drifting off to the Arcola's 'Kenny Morgan' which I found superior and way more emotional.
The set is nice but it reminded me a bit of that one at the NT where everyone kept walking up and down the stairs. 'A Woman Killed With Kindness' or something like that?
Some nice performances (Peter Sullivan and Tom Burke) but on the whole it left me a little underwhelmed. I do think some of my problem with it was with Helen McCrory actually. She's one of those actresses that I know I'm supposed to adore because we're always being told how great she is but the performances I've seen of hers seem to always be infused with that "Look at how hard I'm working at ACTING darling" that it often leaves me a little cold. Don't get me wrong, she certainly wasn't bad. She was good in fact and does her thing very well but for me she just didn't make Hester particularly interesting. Which is a shame as it's such a great part.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Aug 13, 2016 11:15:09 GMT
"Look at how hard I'm working at ACTING darling" that it often leaves me a little cold. Don't get me wrong, she certainly wasn't bad. Yes, I know exactly what you mean. There are quite a few actors in this category that I won't name. The art of acting is appearing not to be acting at all and appearing completely natural, or appearing to do nothing at all.
|
|
211 posts
|
Post by peelee on Aug 14, 2016 15:40:29 GMT
This was interesting enough but nothing special, and the stage design was unkind to actors and audience alike. Also I think that having seen a related play recently, I was prejudiced when watching 'The Deep Blue Sea' at the National the other night. 'Kenny Morgan', recently at the Arcola Theatre was the better play, and about as well acted. It was more convincingly set in its time period, and was a better production. It also had fewer acres on stage for the actors to have to cover. If there could be a few scene changes at the National for its recent revival of 'A Taste of Honey', and for 'The Plough and the Stars', couldn't something similar have been done for 'The Deep Blue Sea"?
|
|
748 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Aug 15, 2016 11:15:27 GMT
Theatremonkey, yes, it certainly was on the matinee I attended. {Spoiler - click to view} But not as loud as reaction on "dirty Jew!" line in Chekhov's Ivanov the day after.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Aug 15, 2016 22:12:37 GMT
Do you mean the second mention theatremonkey? Well actually I think several characters mention it but the big second? If so yes, audible reaction, so much so that someone behind me who clearly hadn't heard it or understand it had it explained to them by their neighbour and then did a belated gasp.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2016 22:50:44 GMT
The thing I wondered about (can't remember if I mentioned it here as I saw it so long ago) was whether the bottle Burke's pal was drinking from, early on, was meant to topple over during their conversation. It looked to me like Burke made a desperate but ultimately unsuccessful grab at it as it went, but then, he may just have been acting...
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Aug 16, 2016 11:40:03 GMT
Yes, Peggs, the big second. LOVE the belated gasp. No, jeanhunt, the bottle was upright when I saw it. It was rather good wasn't it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 11:48:59 GMT
Yes, Peggs, the big second. LOVE the belated gasp. No, jeanhunt, the bottle was upright when I saw it. We should be grateful his reactions are faster when dodging swords in The Musketeers, then. :-) (To be 100% fair, though, it wasn't his fault - I think the other bloke shifted position and the bottle tilted, it was just the other guy had his back to it and Burke happened to be facing...)
|
|
6,285 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Aug 16, 2016 17:58:17 GMT
Helen McCrory is filming Fearless a new ITV drama which rules out a West End transfer for Deep Blue Sea at least for this year.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 18:01:17 GMT
Helen McCrory is filming Fearless a new ITV drama which rules out a West End transfer for Deep Blue Sea at least for this year. I saw this too. Filming starts in August. They wouldn't transfer this without her so it's a shame as a transfer looks bleak now. Maybe in the new year though after No Man's Land?
|
|
371 posts
|
Post by popcultureboy on Aug 17, 2016 7:16:33 GMT
People, Places & Things closed at the NT in November and didn't begin its West End run until the following March. Just because a transfer isn't immediate, doesn't mean the chances of it are bleak.
|
|
99 posts
|
Post by youngoffender on Sept 2, 2016 10:52:19 GMT
I saw the NT Live broadcast last night - perhaps the best way to see it, judging by some of the comments above, as you got the intimacy of facial close-ups and mics/subtitles to overcome any muffled dialogue. The camera direction was well handled, and Carrie Cracknell gave good interview in the break. Some irritating laughter at non-jokes for the first half hour, which fortunately calmed down once the audience realised they had not come to an Ayckbourn.
Rattigan's script remains superbly truthful and raw, but the production fell into the 'good but not great' category for me. As a couple have commented, I couldn't really get beyond 'Helen McCrory playing Hester' to the essence of the character. Tom Burke as Freddie and Nick Fletcher as Dr Miller were better for me, the latter's final exhortation to survive cutting right to the core.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 13:39:37 GMT
I saw this on Thursday too in the cinema, and loved it. I don't know Rattigan at all, and knew nothing about the play, and I've never seen any of the cast before as far as I'm aware, so I didn't have any expectations. I loved it though, and was transfixed. I loved the set design, I thought so many moments looked beautiful, like paintings.
|
|
748 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Sept 4, 2016 14:17:11 GMT
Maybe it IS the best way to see anything. With no expectations whatsover
|
|
816 posts
|
Post by stefy69 on Sept 5, 2016 6:37:51 GMT
Maybe it IS the best way to see anything. With no expectations whatsover Well then you're never disappointed !
|
|
748 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Sept 5, 2016 6:45:22 GMT
For me it's really hard to have none but I always try to keep my excitement down a bit
|
|
64 posts
|
Post by Squire Sullen on Sept 21, 2016 13:04:24 GMT
I don't suppose anyone could tell me the song that Hester kept playing on the record player? I had it in my head all evening after I'd seen this, but now it's completely slipped my mind.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2016 15:54:44 GMT
I don't suppose anyone could tell me the song that Hester kept playing on the record player? I had it in my head all evening after I'd seen this, but now it's completely slipped my mind. Wasn't it 'I Only Have Eyes For You'? Or was I imagining it?
|
|
|
Post by Nicholas on Oct 1, 2016 22:03:35 GMT
Whilst I’m tending towards agreeing with the ‘good but not great’, I think that actually serves this play to a fault. Damning with faint praise, perhaps, but this is not Medea, in which the histrionics are allowed to be so overplayed they’re represented through dance, and nor is it even A Doll’s House, with a plot with the mechanics of a Swiss watch and a crescendo to an iconic ending like no other. It’s a very, very withheld piece, about people who can’t express emotions. What makes this production more moving is how underdone everything is, and how Cracknell completely avoids even the potential of histrionics, making this about as quiet as it can be. I think something lingers from this production, and that comes from it being so subtle, so simple.
Carrie Cracknell has a very open-minded, even-handed approach to her drama (not always – it would have made Blurred Lines boring, and Birdland’s Andrew Scott-centricity gave that its energy – but when it comes to domestic settings particularly). What made A Doll’s House so stunning was that, however triumphant Hattie Morahan was, Cracknell’s treatment of Torvald and Krogstad was kindly, and for brief moments they became heroes of their own minor dramas with Nora, never the victim, almost a villain in their worlds; whilst we ultimately sided completely with Nora, that was despite the faults these prisms made us see in her, and that only made for richer, richer, ever richer drama – if I had to pick a best show ever, I think I’d still plump for that. Her Medea was far kinder on Jason than the play needed to be. Hell, even her Macbeth was strangely non-partisan, though that was a duffer. And here, the things that made it shine were the three dimensions every character had. Tom Burke does a wonderful self-analysis; he begins with caddish confidence and ends with caddish confidence, but at every stage where he’s allowed to be himself he lets us in on this as a façade. When he utters the awful shilling line, it sends chills through its cruelty, but also its possible faux-cruelty: that he’s saying that less because he means it and more because he thinks his ‘character’ of a cad would mean it, and the fact that he would hurt her so again for a façade... Where this egalitarian view came into its own was with Nick Fletcher (the wonderful Krogstadt from earlier), who absolutely stole the show. It looks like I’m not alone in thinking this, and if anyone from here is up for awards I hope it’s him. There’s a simple plain-speaking to him, yet a mournful tiredness, a resilience. It’s so supportive it’s tearjearking. Between the highfalutin pilot phoniness of Burke, and the slightly too-underdone support of Peter Sullivan who I did think didn’t make an impression, Fletcher injects real, sincere, human heart into this, able to articulate to her what McCrory clearly doesn’t allow herself to feel. He’s all the emotions of this piece. Marion Bailey was good in a role much too small for her – not least, when I noticed it was her, I remembered she was so good in Blurred Lines, then I remembered more about that show, then I had this bloody tune going through my head very inappropriately throughout the second half.
Helen McCrory has infinitely less to do than in Medea, and that’s why this is so powerful. Like Burke, she performs to conformity, until she’s allowed to be herself, though even then conformity is her normality; it's an exercise in breaking an unbreakable norm. She plays uncertainty. There’s a central self-doubt, in her occasional voice-cracks, her occasional shakiness, her Teflon approach to any questions about herself, all to reveal that, underneath her calm exterior there’s a desperately sad person, and underneath that there’s an absence where she’s been trying to conform for too long and the artist within, the person Hester used to be, is struggling to be heard. It’s judged rather beautifully, actually, how much of Hester is forced and how much is just because she’s not used to being ‘Hester’ anymore. As she becomes less Hester Collyer, and less Hester Page, her growing realisation that she doesn’t know who Hester alone is anymore is heartbreakingly held back, made more moving by Fletcher’s insistence on bringing out her intrinsic humanity. Because it’s less showy than some other performances (not least her own Medea) it won’t win awards, and arguably it’s less good too, but it’s a very moving portrayal of emptiness and societal conformity and loneliness which comes through clearly.
Unlike other Cracknell shows, this is not one which peaks and peaks and peaks until the tension at the end is airtight, but unlike other Cracknell shows the script she works with demands a subtlety she provides in spades. The ending, after all, is ultimately a boring act – boiling an egg – yet it takes a great director to make something so intrinsically boring so affectingly moving. Because she paints every character in a very human light, and because she demands all emotions be hidden behind the layers of Kenneth Moore-esque acting the 50s require, this Rattigan is a profoundly human, empathetic piece. I didn’t love it (not least, like Plough and Stars, the beautiful set was overblown in this too-big space), but I far more than admired this – its subtle unpicking of its characters’ restraint made for something truly heartbreaking, whilst if its central performance doesn’t set the stage on fire, that’s because it lights a much smaller spark that burns long after the drama is done.
P.S. Do any of you subscribe to the NT Podcasts, and have you heard the Helen McCrory one yet? It’s a bit underwhelming, a little too much of Libby Purves describing the show to Helen McCrory, but some interesting insights about working with Carrie Cracknell. Mostly, though, you can never over-estimate how facetious my mind can get: “Because I worked with Carrie, on Medea...” McCrory starts. “What did she say?” think I, “Kenneth Williams as Creon, Sid James as Jason, Hattie Jacques in the lead – it’s Carry On Medea!”.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on Oct 2, 2016 12:09:45 GMT
Some fiercely intelligent comments there, Nicholas, but I'm not as enamoured of Ms Cracknell's "open-minded, even-handed approach to drama" as you are. To me, her "kind" take on the men in Nora's life and her insistence on opening that play out scenically so that what should have been offstage was always firmly onstage, confusing the issues and, incidentally, totally undercutting Ibsen's "iconic ending like no other", badly damaged the Doll's House production, taking the focus away from where it should always be, on Nora.
As you astutely point out, the same approach was taken toward Jason in Cracknell's Medea production but, again, it didn't help the play to make Jason a more reasonable guy, it took away much of its primal power and made Medea look even worse than she arguably is.
And the treatment of Freddie (Tom Burke) in Deep Blue Sea, as you suggest, reflects the same idea, reducing his caddishness to a kind of affectation which, I suppose, is intended to make Hester's obsession for him more plausible. But, no, Freddie should be an out and out cad, it heightens everything if he's played that way - as he is in Mike Poulton's remake, Kenny Morgan. It makes Hester's situation much more extreme if she's throwing herself at a guy everyone can see is a self-centred bastard, ramping up the pathos in a production which often seems too polite for its own good. It's as if Cracknell is at pains to mediate the drama in the name of fair play to all characters which, to me, is an essentially undramatic approach.
|
|