|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2016 16:00:34 GMT
Appalled that the St James apparently think they can justify £50 tickets to a two-hander. It's a Fringe venue! It is a steep price. I doubt it would be such an expense if Barksy and JRB weren't attached. I love the music, but I question if I would have bought a ticket so quickly had those two not been involved. The St James has had shows with an ensemble cast of 28 and a band of 6 with cheaper prices.
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Oct 22, 2016 20:48:19 GMT
Managed to pick up a pair of tickets online for the first preview on Friday - row N so back row but only £19.50 rather than the eye-watering £50. It'll be a theatre-full couple of days, with School of Rock (£15 row E circle) the night before.
Really looking forward to it - L5Y is a staple at the Edinburgh Fringe so I've seen it many times (including with the current Raoul as Jamie) but this'll be my first professional production.
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 22, 2016 21:37:38 GMT
I too will be there Alison. Feel free to say hello
|
|
5,288 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Oct 23, 2016 23:20:50 GMT
What a rip off. Anyone that pays that needs professional help.
These greedy producers will be the death of theatre.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 15:16:56 GMT
Well hello Mr Bailey . . .
|
|
591 posts
|
Post by AddisonMizner on Oct 25, 2016 15:50:00 GMT
Well hello Miss Barks!
Loved the old poster, but like this too.
I really can't wait to see this in a few weeks time.
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Oct 26, 2016 22:53:48 GMT
I now have a spare £19.50 ticket for this Friday as my friend is ill, I've just posted it in the noticeboard section. PM me if you're interested - it seems a shame for it to go to waste.
|
|
5,288 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Oct 26, 2016 22:59:44 GMT
He is so damn cute
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Oct 27, 2016 5:59:18 GMT
|
|
103 posts
|
Post by sondheimhats on Oct 27, 2016 9:40:08 GMT
I now have a spare £19.50 ticket for this Friday as my friend is ill, I've just posted it in the noticeboard section. PM me if you're interested - it seems a shame for it to go to waste. I sent you a PM! Let me know if it's still available
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 28, 2016 5:13:47 GMT
So looking forward to this tonight. Theatreboard bade will be on.
|
|
35 posts
|
Post by welcometodreamland on Oct 28, 2016 10:47:41 GMT
Will likely skip this despite it having Samantha Barks.
I saw the film and found it kind of "meh" despite having Anna Kendrick, who I really rate highly.
Hope everyone enjoys it.
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 28, 2016 17:20:01 GMT
Am here now proudly wearing my theatreboad badge
|
|
134 posts
|
Post by romeo94 on Oct 28, 2016 21:45:29 GMT
I can't afford £45 to see this - such a sad state where tickets are being priced too high for so many people. No standing room allocation either. This makes me so angry.
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Oct 28, 2016 22:03:42 GMT
Well, the prices are stupid, but the show is well worth a visit if you can swing it. I'm trying to figure out if I have any spare organs to sell on the black market so I can afford to go back later in the run.
For a first preview it's in good shape, even if it did start half an hour late. JRB came out at the start to tell us that the actors were ready for us but the set might not be (cue much laughter), and it's true that there were a couple of set mishaps: some falling paper, a missing bench, a door that wouldn't open properly etc. Nothing unexpected for a first preview. There may have been some sound issues, a couple of lines were a little quiet and it seemed that Jonathan was having trouble hearing the band at the start of The Next Ten Minutes.
Samantha Barks ... what a voice. Of the two, it's clear that she's a more accomplished singer, but I thought her acting was fine for the earlier songs and she really came into her own later on. Both Climbing Uphill and I Can Do Better Than That were very funny and got a great reception, and by Goodbye Until Tomorrow I was just about ready to burst into tears from her utter hopefulness. She was also really lovely afterwards.
Jonathan Bailey is not the soaring, effortless tenor who's often cast as Jamie, but his voice is solid enough (and will improve over the run, I'm sure) and I didn't feel his overall performance was any the less for it. He's ridiculously charming and engaging, and a fantastic actor. He played his first couple of songs to several individual audience members (at least that's how it looked from the back row) to much laughter. There's a lot going on in those staging-wise (possibly too much), yet he made it look easy. I Didn't Believe in You had me welling up - it's always been one of my favourites and he didn't disappoint. For the shallow-minded among us: A) the beard has gone and B) he's just as gorgeous close up.
I noticed a couple of lyric changes. I Can Do Better Than That: "Met a guy in a class I was taking with some very well placed tattoos." (which I think I've heard before), If I Didn't Believe in You: "Is it just that you're disappointed to be touring again for the summer?" was changed to a specific reference to Ohio, I can't remember the exact line. Oh, and the Linda Blair reference in Climbing Uphill was David Hasselhoff.
And as an aside, I do find it amusing that they have an advert in the program for their cocktail offers, with a notice saying remember to order your interval drinks before the show. Oops!
Oh dear, I appear to have written a mini novel. That's what happens when I have a slow train home and I've finished my book.
And I almost forgot - it was lovely to meet Anthony and sondheimhats and talk theatre with you both. :-)
Edit: I've just remembered the thing that irritated me (probably more than it should have). No idea whether it was an oopsie for today (fingers crossed, since he did then have it for the rest of the show) but Jonathan wasn't wearing a wedding ring for A Miracle Would Happen. If you've got a lyric (and accompanying gesture) that draws attention to it, you really should have the ring.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2016 22:10:04 GMT
I noticed a couple of lyric changes. I Can Do Better Than That: "Met a guy in a class I was taking with some very well placed tattoos." (which I think I've heard before), If I Didn't Believe in You: "Is it just that you're disappointed to be touring again for the summer?" was changed to a specific reference to Ohio, I can't remember the exact line. Oh, and the Linda Blair reference in Climbing Uphill was David Hasselhoff. Yep both the well placed tattoos and 'is it just that you're disappointed to be going again to Ohio?' were used in the movie. How was the view from back row? That's where I'm sitting.
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Oct 28, 2016 22:14:47 GMT
I don't know how I picked up on the tattoos line in the movie but not the Ohio one. Oh well. Maybe I tuned out for a second.
The view was fine. The rows are well raked (although I had an irritating moving head in front of me), and although we were looking down on the performers I didn't feel too distant. Ideally I'd like to see it from closer, but for the price it was great.
On the negative side, I could hear some whispering from the sound desk at the start of the show, and whenever anyone left/entered the auditorium (which happened too many times for a 90 minute show, grr) it was mildly irritating.
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 29, 2016 12:32:48 GMT
So I caught this last night and I gotta say, for a first preview, this is in phenomenal shape.
Forgive my delay in posting these comments. Personal circumstances have prevented me from doing so any sooner. In addition, I need time to think about it.
Despite this supposed to start at 7:30pm, the doors didn’t open till 7:35. The theatre itself, with the exception of the odd single seat or two, was full and the audience was extremely enthusiastic.
Jason Robert Brown comes out on stage holding a notepad (Yes! It was him!!!!) cue woolf whistles, cheering, clapping, etc. and he tells us that they are/aren’t easy for us., letting us know that bits of furniture the supposed to come on and ff stage may not but vocally the cast are ready, having practiced for four weeks. The then let us know he’s gonna sit in the audience so the show can start, which it did at about 8pm.
Looking at the stage, it’s relatively sparse and blue. There are faux blue bricks on the sides of the stage and the back wall. It is split in two, with the small orchestra (who were very good) visible and sitting above. Throughout the show there brick panels slide across to reveal furniture that slide in and out. Window panels also slide across from either side hiding the orchestra at points and these are used to great effect, with lights filtering through forming square panels onto the stage. Throughout The Schmeul Song visual images such as snow falling, the morning sun rising are shown.
There are so many great things about this show. What’s great about this production is that it’s directed by Jason Robert Brown himself. Nobody knows these characters and there situation better than him. I mean he wrote the damn thing! Sure, actors can bring their own interpretation to these characters but what were seeing here is his vision.
Speaking of the actors, they’re good. Really good. Firstly, Jonathan Bailey as Jamie is not bearded as he appears in the poster images, but clean shaven. His enthusiasm leaps off the stage and he spots an audience member (presumably female) and sings directly to them. I mean right at them.
And Samantha Barks as Cathy vocally is outstanding. Do not kid yourself, I don’t know what’s going on with her lungs but this little Welsh girl can really belt! I mean seriously! And such a pretty girl.
After each song it just seemed the audience reaction just got louder. And the song The Next Ten Minutes is stages beautifully and with such poignancy that I was genuinely moved. I felt Jamie’s vulnerably and sincerity as he proposed to Cathy in a little boat and she looked simply beautiful. For me, the only thing that would have made this visually perfect is if Jamie wore a yulmika/kippa (a Jewish skull cap) and if the boat slowly revolved.
The only proper professional production of this show I’ve ever seen of this show in the past was at The Menier Chocolate Factory with Damien Humbley and Lara Pulver and Jamie wore a yulmika/kippa in this version. I mean so much is made of him being Jewish in his first song, right?
And last night, whilst in terms of projection Samantha Barks may have outshone Jonathan Bailey, they complimented each other well.
I love this show. I really do. The little nuances, piano snippets and lyrics. I mean look ay my tag line. The problem is that I have been listing to the off broadway cast recording for near on 15years and am so familiar with the way Sheree Renee Scott and Norbert Leo But interpret these songs that at times it’s difficult to separate their vocals from visually what I’m seeing on stage but last night Jonathan Bailey and Samantha Barks did that I was able to appreciate this show on a whole new level.
I mean every person, regardless of gender or sexuality can relate to this. I mean we’ve all been dumped or broken up with someone so can relate. And the lyrics are so good that depending on the day you may feel the reason they broke up is Jamie’s fault. Or was it Cathy’s?
As I say, this show is good. Nay, outstanding and there were standing ovations. The show is sung through with no intermission and we were out by 9:30pm, so not too late.
The only problem with last nights show was some backstage issued and the odd lighting issued. At one point (seriously) it sounded like cutlery was being dropped! But again, it was first night previews.
I would STRONGLY recommend that anyone, with any (even if it be vague) interest in musical theatre see this.
Oh, and I got to meet the level Alison last night.
To top the night off, I managed to get a selfie with Samantha Barks and a second with Jason Robert Brown (yes!-fist pump!)
And, for anyone who’s familiar with my previous posts regarding the St Jame’s Theatre and this show, I am happy to say that there were no repeat unfortunate incidents involving chocolate bars and no children or pregnant women harmed or pushed out of the way in my zeal to get my Jason Robert Brown selfie.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2016 22:12:18 GMT
Yeah, they changed the tattoos line years back once it became apparent "Tom Cruise" was no longer shorthand for "attractive man" and became instead a byword for crazy.
|
|
372 posts
|
Post by hitmewithurbethshot on Oct 29, 2016 23:01:35 GMT
How long does the show last? Planning on seeing the Thursday matinee if I can get to work afterwards on time (work is in Clapham at 5pm, so anything finishing on or after 4:30pm is a no-go)
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 29, 2016 23:18:48 GMT
As stated in my post above, 90 mins with no interval
|
|
535 posts
|
Post by jek on Oct 30, 2016 9:01:17 GMT
Accompanied my daughter to see this yesterday as she is still a bit young (15) for solo theatre trips but she really wanted to see it. I hadn't liked the film and so I knew it wasn't my kind of thing. She absolutely loved it and I was able to appreciate the talent on show - particularly in the band. If, like me, you have children in mid to late teens Jonathan Bailey will forever be Leonardo, the eponymous hero of the CBBC series in which he and a group of fellow teens worked hard to thwart the evil Machiavelli in the court of the Medicis. The sort of hokum that kids of around the age of ten can endlessly enjoy on repeat.
|
|
1,008 posts
|
Post by talkstageytome on Oct 30, 2016 11:01:42 GMT
`Saw the matinee yesterday from the front row on the left side. Obviously it was a side view and so you miss out a bit on seeing the 'set' but it was pretty minimal though, and for a fiver I was over the moon with our seats! (minor plot 'spoilers' ahead, but really if you know the show or the songs in order then you won't have any trouble...) Don't know why I was uncertain about whether I'd like Samantha Barks as Cathy, as she was incredible. Such a powerful belt, and lovely subtle acting which I really appreciated from the front row. (she also got some lovely costumes! Major outfit envy). Particularly shone in I'm a Part of That and Goodbye Until Tomorrow, which killed me! Jonathan Bailey was good too. From his first entrance he gave off a lovable vibe and maintained that throughout the entire first section. Admittedly, his switch from loved up to dispicable between the Next Ten Minutes and A Miracle Would Happen was very abrupt, but I think that's pretty much how it goes with most productions. Really enjoyed his voice too! He did seem to struggle a bit with Schmuel Song and some of the higher bits had been lowered for him I think, but that's just a tiny nitpick and really didn't matter at all. I really enjoyed his Shiksa Goddess (VERY funny and endearing) and If I Didn't Believe in You (which was played in my general direction) was a tearjerker too. God I hate that character though! I always think with TL5Y there's not much you can do directionwise to make it stand out from other productions, but here the direction really struck me. Just a very slick production with lots of nuances. Nice to see JRB in the audience overseeing as well. All in all I came out very happy. One of the best things I've seen in a long time, I think. This is one of my favourite shows and I wasn't disappointed at all. (oh and I think I saw Stasia? On the front row in the centre? ) Edit - My sister is 19 and she remembers him in Leonardo! We also saw him in the National's Othello though, so if anyone asks what they'd know him from, we're going to go with that
|
|
103 posts
|
Post by sondheimhats on Oct 30, 2016 11:11:59 GMT
I was also at the first preview (thanks again for letting me use your extra ticket, Alison!)
This has been among my favorite musicals for the last five years (*cue rimshot* but actually, I did discover it 5 years ago). It's so tenderly written, so tragic in its simplicity. So I definitely loved returning to see it again.
They originally did this production of the show in Off-Broadway in New York in 2013, and I was lucky enough to see the 1st preview of that incarnation as well (just a strange coincidence that I happened to find myself at both the 1st preview both times). I think JRB's direction is fine, but I do have some issues with it. I think, in some ways, it's too busy. In my opinion, there is more furniture moving on and off than there needs to be, more lighting tricks than there needs to be, and the video projections are just gratuitous and distracting. It seems strange to me that JRB would feel that the show needs these bells and whistles (particularly the video), rather than just letting the text and performances speak for themselves. I can't help but wonder if perhaps JRB feels vulnerable directing this show, since he wrote it based on his own experiences, and feels he has to prove something by adding a lot of production elements. Just speculation, of course.
This "busy" feeling is also reflected in Brown's direction of Jamie. He's given Jamie a lot of business to do onstage during his numbers, such as interacting with audience members, having him jump in and out of squares of light, and laboriously act out every sentence of the Schmuel song while pretending to be the clock. This was not so much the case with Cathy. Samantha Barks, as a result, struck me as much more grounded and sure of herself than Bailey was. Again, I wonder if Brown felt vulnerable directing Jamie's scenes, given that Jamie is based on himself.
Bailey is very charming as Jamie, and does an excellent job for someone who is not as known for musical theatre. I was distracted throughout the show by his less-than-convincing American accent, and by the extraneous stage-business I mentioned above, but otherwise he was good. Samantha Barks has an incredible voice, and her acting, as I said above, was very grounded and subtle, though perhaps not as interesting to watch.
|
|
3,791 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Oct 30, 2016 16:41:03 GMT
I was also at the first preview (thanks again for letting me use your extra ticket, Alison!) This has been among my favorite musicals for the last five years (*cue rimshot* but actually, I did discover it 5 years ago). It's so tenderly written, so tragic in its simplicity. So I definitely loved returning to see it again. They originally did this production of the show in Off-Broadway in New York in 2013, and I was lucky enough to see the 1st preview of that incarnation as well (just a strange coincidence that I happened to find myself at both the 1st preview both times). I think JRB's direction is fine, but I do have some issues with it. I think, in some ways, it's too busy. In my opinion, there is more furniture moving on and off than there needs to be, more lighting tricks than there needs to be, and the video projections are just gratuitous and distracting. It seems strange to me that JRB would feel that the show needs these bells and whistles (particularly the video), rather than just letting the text and performances speak for themselves. I can't help but wonder if perhaps JRB feels vulnerable directing this show, since he wrote it based on his own experiences, and feels he has to prove something by adding a lot of production elements. Just speculation, of course. This "busy" feeling is also reflected in Brown's direction of Jamie. He's given Jamie a lot of business to do onstage during his numbers, such as interacting with audience members, having him jump in and out of squares of light, and laboriously act out every sentence of the Schmuel song while pretending to be the clock. This was not so much the case with Cathy. Samantha Barks, as a result, struck me as much more grounded and sure of herself than Bailey was. Again, I wonder if Brown felt vulnerable directing Jamie's scenes, given that Jamie is based on himself. Bailey is very charming as Jamie, and does an excellent job for someone who is not as known for musical theatre. I was distracted throughout the show by his less-than-convincing American accent, and by the extraneous stage-business I mentioned above, but otherwise he was good. Samantha Barks has an incredible voice, and her acting, as I said above, was very grounded and subtle, though perhaps not as interesting to watch. Ah sondheimhats I too was at that performance. You should have said hello. Alison did.
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Oct 30, 2016 17:07:41 GMT
Bailey is very charming as Jamie, and does an excellent job for someone who is not as known for musical theatre. I was distracted throughout the show by his less-than-convincing American accent, and by the extraneous stage-business I mentioned above, but otherwise he was good. Samantha Barks has an incredible voice, and her acting, as I said above, was very grounded and subtle, though perhaps not as interesting to watch. BIB - I did wonder what you thought after our conversation about being more sensitive to dodgy accents that are close to your own, and forgot to ask you afterwards. It wasn't something that bothered me at all, I can't really say I had an opinion at the time over whether it was good/bad/indifferent, but I can see why it would annoy you. talkstageytome, your comment about Jamie becoming despicable reminded me of something else that confused/irritated me - the end of A Miracle Would Happen ("I'll be there soon, Cathy ..."). Every time I've listened to the recording, I've never imagined that section as anything other than Jamie genuinely getting caught up in his work and inadvertently putting it before his wife, rather than him outright lying to her (which seems to be what's implied here, since if I remember rightly Jonathan still had a bottle in his hand while he was on the phone). It's not a choice I like at all, and makes him a far less sympathetic character in my eyes. Sure, the whole "I'm wondering if I did the right thing getting married and feeling a bit trapped" thing is less than perfect, but perfect characters are boring and not realistic. The important thing is that he doesn't act on it and tries to be a good husband ... *that* Jamie I'm behind until Nobody Needs to Know, when he does go too far. Which I can understand, with a good actor to play the journey, even if I don't agree with it. But I do not like the lying coming so early in the story, and the realisation that that's probably what JRB intended ... it's funny how we look at things differently, isn't it? And to add another one into the mix, my choice of "where you might have seen Jonathan Bailey before" material has been Broadchurch. Given that that and Hooten and the Lady are the only two things I've seen him in, it was an easy choice.
|
|
1,008 posts
|
Post by talkstageytome on Oct 30, 2016 17:16:28 GMT
Yes I noticed that bit of A Miracle Would Happen! Really villainised him. It didn't seem to add up given how he'd been acting up until that point.
|
|
642 posts
|
Post by Stasia on Oct 30, 2016 17:58:33 GMT
`Saw the matinee yesterday from the front row on the left side. Obviously it was a side view and so you miss out a bit on seeing the 'set' but it was pretty minimal though, and for a fiver I was over the moon with our seats! (minor plot 'spoilers' ahead, but really if you know the show or the songs in order then you won't have any trouble...) Don't know why I was uncertain about whether I'd like Samantha Barks as Cathy, as she was incredible. Such a powerful belt, and lovely subtle acting which I really appreciated from the front row. (she also got some lovely costumes! Major outfit envy). Particularly shone in I'm a Part of That and Goodbye Until Tomorrow, which killed me! Jonathan Bailey was good too. From his first entrance he gave off a lovable vibe and maintained that throughout the entire first section. Admittedly, his switch from loved up to dispicable between the Next Ten Minutes and A Miracle Would Happen was very abrupt, but I think that's pretty much how it goes with most productions. Really enjoyed his voice too! He did seem to struggle a bit with Schmuel Song and some of the higher bits had been lowered for him I think, but that's just a tiny nitpick and really didn't matter at all. I really enjoyed his Shiksa Goddess (VERY funny and endearing) and If I Didn't Believe in You (which was played in my general direction) was a tearjerker too. God I hate that character though! I always think with TL5Y there's not much you can do directionwise to make it stand out from other productions, but here the direction really struck me. Just a very slick production with lots of nuances. Nice to see JRB in the audience overseeing as well. All in all I came out very happy. One of the best things I've seen in a long time, I think. This is one of my favourite shows and I wasn't disappointed at all. (oh and I think I saw Stasia? On the front row in the centre? ) Edit - My sister is 19 and she remembers him in Leonardo! We also saw him in the National's Othello though, so if anyone asks what they'd know him from, we're going to go with that Yep that was me! With my 17 shows in 8,5 days and quite a few meetings with friends I don't gave time to post while I'm here. Sometimes I don't have time to eat and sleap More thoughts on the show later, just a quick brag: got the whole Schmuel Song acted on me and for me. If Jonathan says "Merry Christmas", let it be Christmas!
|
|
1,016 posts
|
Post by andrew on Oct 31, 2016 0:26:35 GMT
Was there on Saturday night. I had never heard any of the music or seen the film, I knew only of this by reputation.
I've got to say, I enjoyed this so, so much. Bailey and Barks were both brilliant, particularly Barks, she really is a musical theatre star now. Bailey you could hear at certain moments wasn't quite up to the material vocally but nailed so many songs and acted the hell out of the role and the Schmuel Song was a highlight. It was interesting to sondheimhats review above about this being a little bit too busy, and true enough there were bits where I was thinking to myself that there's no need for these windows to move and TV screens to come in and we don't really need these squares. I don't think they got in the way though.
JRB was in the audience again, sadly too far to my right to be able to talk to as we all filed out. A ring early on fell onto the floor and bounced all over the place, then a letter fell off and sat centre stage for 10 minutes until Bailey picked it up and stuffed it away. The mirror and doorway had a stagehand behind them at all points. And one piece of set was pushed too far on then hastily pulled all the way back. Some actors missed their lights (or some lights missed their actors). What was completely on target though was the excellent band and this fantastic two-person cast. I've been recommending to everyone that asks me about this to go, and I think I'll end up going again. I've got the Broadway album on as I type this.
4.5 stars
|
|
665 posts
|
Post by westendcub on Oct 31, 2016 13:40:15 GMT
`Saw the matinee yesterday from the front row on the left side. Obviously it was a side view and so you miss out a bit on seeing the 'set' but it was pretty minimal though, and for a fiver I was over the moon with our seats! Excellent to hear, my friend and I are going tonight in the £5 seats!!
|
|